← Library
Patna High CourtC.R./102/2019dismissed

Sudama Sah v. Ramraj Keshari

2023-10-10Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVISION No.102 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Sudama Sah Son of Late Rajgrihi Sah Resident of Village- Baghini Kala, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). 2.

Smt. Sita Devi Wife of Suresh Pandey @ Suresh Kumar Pandey Resident of Village- Baghini Kala, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Ramraj Keshari Son of Bhagwan Das Keshri Resident of Village- Mohania, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur.

2.

Biram Chand Keshri Son of Bhagwan Das Keshri Resident of VillageMohania, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur. 3.

Shri Thakur Krishna Ballabh Sahay Son of Late Rewati Raman Sinha Resident of Village- Amarpura, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

4.

Thakur Surendra Nath Sahay @ Surendra Kumar Prasad Son of Late Rewati Raman Sinha Resident of Village- Amarpura, Police Station- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

5.

Thakur Krishna Murari Sahay @ Thakur Vinod Kumar Son of Pashupati Nath Resident of Village- Amarpura, Police Station- Mohania, DistrictKaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2023 Vide peremptory order dated 26.09.2023 on submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, as a last indulgence, two weeks' further time was granted for complying the order dated 17.07.2023 and it was ordered that failing the same, the civil revision application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.

2. Despite that, the petitioners have not complied the

Patna High Court C.R. No.102 of 2019(8) dt.10-10-2023 2/2 said peremptory order.

3. Accordingly, this civil revision application stands dismissed for default due to non-compliance.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T