← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42286/2022allowed

Ashok Kumar Yadav @ Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-28Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42286 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2022 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== ASHOK KUMAR YADAV @ ASHOK YADAV S/O GANESH YADAV Resident of village- Dumri Parsa, Tola- Dumri, Ward No- 2, P.s.- Majhaulia, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons is said to have abused the informant and assaulted the informant which caused head injury and snatched Rs. 70,000/- from the pocket of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42286 of 2022(2) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that injuries found upon the victim is simple in nature. He further submits that there is land dispute between the parties. He submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is admitted land dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 74/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T