Kumari Sudha And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45262 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45262 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2017 Thana -DARBHANGA GRP CASE DistrictDARBHANGA ======================================================

1. .Kumari Sudha , Wife of Ram Babu Chaudhary, resident of village - Panapur Dharampur, P.S - Bidupur, Dist. Vaishali.

2. Rekha Devi, Wife of Manish Kumar, resident of village - Panapur Dharampur, P.S - Bidupur, Dist. Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Rail Darbhanga P.S. Case No. 80 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 13.44 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are ladies and have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedents and have been in judicial custody since 07.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45262 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and further the petitioners are ladies, as such, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -IV -Cum - Special Judge, Darbhanga, in connection with Rail Darbhanga P.S. Case No. 80 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T