← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50743/2018rejected

Hakim Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-06Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50743 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2018 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Hakim Singh, S/o Devi Dayal, R/o Vill.- Ram Nagar, P.S.- Bakewal, DistrictItawa (Uttar Pradesh). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner, being the husband, is in custody in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No.175 of 2018 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Diary in the present case was called for along with viscera report.

A report from the Forensic Science Laboratory, Bihar, Patna, has been received, which indicates that the sample of viscera of Priyanka Kumari, which had been sent for examination, did not reveal the presence of any Metallic, Alkaloidal, Glycosidal, Pesticidal or Volatile Poison from all the samples as sent for examination. Thus, the speculation that she may have been poisoned to death stands overruled.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50743 of 2018(6) dt.06-02-2019 2/2 So far as the case diary is concerned, the post-mortem examination report, which has been appended to it, clearly reveals that there were multiple injuries on the person of the deceased girl who had been married to the present petitioner only four days back. It also appears that the death has been caused due to strangulation and under suspicion circumstances. In view of the aforementioned facts, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected. Let the viscera report be sent back to the court concerned under sealed cover.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T