← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53345/2021dismissed

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-06Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53345 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2018 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Choudhary, aged about 32 years, Male Son of Late Vinay Yadav, Resident to Village- Paikauli Bado, P.S.- Phulwariya, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhramveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 266 of 2018 lodged on 26.11.2018 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code by Banguri Devi, the victim lady who subsequently succumbed to the burn injury.

As per the prosecution case, on 19th November, 2018, all the named accused after verbally abusing the informant (deceased) due to land dispute later poured kerosene oil and set her on fire. She was rushed to the hospital where she lodged this FIR and later succumbed to her injury.

Although the petitioner is the named accused, the matter dates back to 2018, the anticipatory bail preferred by him

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53345 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 2/2 vide Cr. Misc. No. 11900 of 2019 was rejected on 27.02.2019 with the direction to surrender and make prayer for regular bail, he choose to finally come within the judicial custody only on 28.06.2021.

Considering the fact that he is named accused, evaded arrest for long and has finally been taken into the judicial custody, I am not inclined to grant any relief to him and the prayer for bail is accordingly, rejected.

The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Anand Kr.

U T