← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12846/2019disposed

Pradeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-27Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12846 of 2019 ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar Son of Sri Yugeshwar Sah Resident of Village- Madhuban, Ward No.-01, Police Station- Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), DistrictMadhepura- 852113. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Madhepura.

2.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhepura.

3.

The District Supply Officer, Madhepura.

4.

The Block Supply Officer, Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. 5.

The Block Supply Officer, Murliganj, District- Madhepura. 6.

The Station House Officer, Murliganj Police Station, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner has moved this Court against the order of confiscation which is an appealable order before the learned Sessions Judge.

Learned counsel or the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file statutory appeal within a period of 30 days from today.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the same.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12846 of 2019(2) dt.27-07-2019 2/2 Permission is granted.

The writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the learned Sessions Jude in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from today and in case such an appeal is preferred the same shall be considered on its own merit and in case any question of limitation arises, the same shall be considered keeping in mind that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court under some bona fide belief. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U