Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37778/2017bail granted

Munna Sahani @ Niraj v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-24Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37778 of 2017 (4) dt.24-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37778 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2017 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Munna Sahani @ Niraj Son of Lalan Sahni, R/o Village- Majvraha, P.S.- Raghunathpur (O.P.), District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Turkauliya (Raghunathpur) P.S. Case No. 186 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 36 and 38(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 12 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has remained in judicial custody for last two and half months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and also that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37778 of 2017 (4) dt.24-08-2017 petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for two and half months, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, VIII cum Special Judge, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Turkauliya (Raghunathpur) P.S. Case No. 186 of 2017. It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T