Mohd. Imran Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51767 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2020 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mohd. Imran Ansari S/O Mohammed Alam Ansari R/O Village-Bakhari, P.SChakia, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Minhaj Khatoon D/O Md. Farukh Hussain R/O Village-Konihiya Tola Barkurwa, P.S-Chakia, District-East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh Mr. Abhishek Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of D.P. Act.

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51767 of 2021(3) dt.26-07-2022 2/2 dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no. 2. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the informant received three injuries. Injury no. 1 is burn injury on left hand palm, injury no. 2 is burn injury on left abdomen and injury no. 3 is bruise on right check. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 93 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T