Sushil Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41858 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2017 Thana -MANJHI District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Sushil Kumar Sah Son of Parmeshwar Sah, R/o Village- Ghorhat Mathiya, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Manjhi P.S. Case No.118 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 376/511 of the I.P.C. and Section 7/8 of the Bihar POSCO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of attempting to commit rape upon the minor grand daughter of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 28.06.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41858 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also who opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the attempt has been committed by the petitioner for rape on a minor girl, as such, he does not deserve bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of seven months and, if not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed, (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U