← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27595/2016rejected

Krishnawati Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-20Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27595 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2016 Thana -GOPALGANJ CITY District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Krishnawati Devi, wife of Madan Sharma

2. Rima Kumari, D/o Madan Sharma

3. Madan Sharma, Son of Achhelal Sharma

4. Guddu Sharma @ Guddhu Kumar Sharma, Son of Madan Sharma All Resident of Village- Harakhuwa Nawka Tola, P.S. & DistrictGopalganj .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti, Advocate For the State : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned Counsel for the informant is also present.

The petitioners No.1, 3 and 4 being the mother-in-law, father-in-law and Devar of the deceased lady are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Case diary was called for, which has since been received.

Earlier unmarried Nanad, namely, Rima Kumari

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27595 of 2016 (3) dt.20-10-2016 2/2 (Petitioner no.2) had been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State after perusal of the case diary submits that there is sufficient material in the case diary to indicate the complicity of the present petitioners in the occurrence.

Accordingly, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, namely, Krishnawati Devi, Madan Sharma and Guddu Sharma @ Guddhu Kumar Sharma. It is thus rejected. The application for regular bail, however, may be considered without being prejudiced of this order. (Anjana Mishra, J.) ravi/- U T