Rajesh Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.20044 of 2011 dt.03-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20044 of 2011 =========================================================== Rajesh Prasad Yadav Son Of Late Amal Prasad Yadav Resident of Village: Tadhwa Nandpur, P.S. & Block: Bairiya, District:West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary (Food), Bihar at Patna.

2. The Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah.

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bettiah, West Champaran.

4. The District Supply Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah.

5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

6. The Block Development Officer, Bairiya, West Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAVINDRA KR CHOUBEY SC8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-10-2018 As none appeared on behalf of the petitioner the matter was passed over for a few cases. However, on repeat call the petitioner was again not represented.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo no. 496 dated 17.06.2011 and memo nos. 1007 and 1026, both dated 20.09.2011 (Annexure-P1 series) issued by the Block Development Officer, Bairiya (Respondent No. 6) by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and states that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of

Patna High Court CWJC No.20044 of 2011 dt.03-10-2018 undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. Having regard to the stand of the respondents, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.10.2018 Transmission Date NA