Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50688/2018bail granted

Md. Tarique Anwar @ Tarik Anwar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50688 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -441 Year- 2018 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Md. Tarique Anwar @ Tarik Anwar Son of Jauhar Ali Resident of Village- Jam Singh, P.S. Rajrappa Project, District Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neerad Parashar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 04.07.2018 in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 441 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 38, 47 of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 720 liters country made liquor from the Tata Sumo car and the petitioner is said to be the driver of the vehicle.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that F.I.R. itself shows that the petitioner himself is driver of the said vehicle and he has no criminal antecedent. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 04.07.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50688 of 2018 (3) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise (Gaya), in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 441 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T