Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47767/2017bail granted

Azad Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47767 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1087 Year- 2012 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Azad Ansari, Son of Noor Hassan Ansari, Resident of villageIndrahiyan Karup, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Saida Khatoon, Wife of Azad Ansari, Resident of Village- Inrhiya Karup, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas, presently reside at D/o Marhum Jan Mohammad Ansari, P.S.- Chitaukhar, P.S.- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D.P. Act. The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2017. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47767 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Complaint case No.1087 of 2012. (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T