Patna High CourtCWJC/5376/2014disposed

Md. Imam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-11Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5376 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Imam, Son of Late Mendi Mian Resident Of Village - Mahesara, P.S. Gopalpur Anchal - Sikata Sub Division, Narkatiaganj, District - West Champaran ( Bettiah ) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, West Champaran ( Bettiah )

3. The Additional Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran, Bettiah

5. The Circle Officer, Sikta Block, Narkatiaganj, District - West Champaran, Bettiah

6. The Investigating Officer, Gopalpur, West Champaran, Bettiah

7. Dev Prasad Raut Son Of Late Udit Raut

8. Bhagirath Raut Son Of Dev Prasad Raut

9. Bishun Raut Son Of Dev Prasad Raut

10. Birwal Raut Son Of Late Nagina Raut

11. Ramrup Raut Son Of Late Nagina Raut

12. Hira Raut Son Of Late Udit Yadav Respondent No. 7 To 12, All Residents Of Village - Mahesara, P.S. Gopalpur Anchal - Sikata Sub Division, Narkatiaganj, District - West Champaran ( Bettiah ) .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Raghunandan Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Upadhyay Saurabh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. A.Ujjwal, SC-25 Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 11-03-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that encroachment case has been brought to its logical conclusion but it has been found that there is still an encroachment on public land by one Hira Raut, however, the same was not subject matter of the present encroachment proceeding.

Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of

Patna High Court CWJC No.5376 of 2014 (5) dt.11-03-2016 2/2 in view of the fact that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. So far encroachment on another plots are concerned, if the petitioner is aggrieved, he would be at liberty to approach the Circle Officer concerned for initiation of a proceeding upon any public land which has been encroached by somebody.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U