Brahamdeo Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35146 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -DHURAIYA District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Brahamdeo Mahto Son of Nepali Mahto, Resident of Village-Uchdiha, P.s. Dhoraiya, District-Banka.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dhoraiya P.S.Case No.90 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 337, 338, 332, 33, 353, 188, 395-B, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R is that the accused persons including the petitioner protested against the police personnel and abused them and they also used abusive languages against the community.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is nothing specific mentioned against the petitioner and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35146 of 2017 (2) dt.04-08-2017 2/2 is in custody for about two months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Banka in connection with Dhoraiya P.S.Case No.90 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T