← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5559/2014disposed

Dhiraj Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-08Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5559 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Dhiraj Kumar Mishra S/O - Late Sudhir Mishra R/O - Village + P.O. - Pothiya, P.S. - Falka, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Education Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate-Cum-Chairman, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, District - Katihar

4. The District Education Officer, District - Katihar

5. The District Programme Officer (Estt.). Katihar

6. The Block Development Officer, Block - Falka, District - Katihar

7. The Block Education Officer, Block - Falka, District - Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH For the Respondent/s : Mr. ANIL KR UAPDHYAY, SC 20 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-03-2016 The Full Bench decision of this Court, rendered in the case of State of Bihar and others Vs. Rajeev Ran Vijay Kumar, reported in 2010(3) PLJR 294, has not been interfered with or set aside till yet, with regard to the policy on compassionate appointment and the opening to which a claimant of former teachers are entitled to.

The maximum which this Court is willing to do is to provide indulgence to the petitioner to move the authorities to consider his case in light of the observation of the Hon`ble Apex Court, which is

Patna High Court CWJC No.5559 of 2014 dt.08-03-2016 annexed as Anneuxre-4 to the writ application. The Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the claim of the petitioner over and above what has been recorded in the earlier part of the order.

Writ application stands disposed of in terms of the above. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U