← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51881/2021bail granted

Suresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-04Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51881 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- JAYRAMPUR District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

SURESH RAM Son of Late Ramchandra Ram Resident of Village - Teus, P.S.- Jairampur, District - Shekhpura 2.

Ramotar Ram Son of Natho Ram Resident of Village - Teus, P.S.- Jairampur, District - Shekhpura 3.

Mithlesh Kumar Son of Krishna Kumar Resident of Village - Teus, P.S.- Jairampur, District - Shekhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anjana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 448, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of assault upon the informant and her brothers, namely, Shantanu Kumar and Prabhakar Kumar by the petitioners and other accused persons as well as petitioner no.1 (Suresh Ram) thrashed the mother of the informant on the earth causing fracture in her waist It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51881 of 2021(2) dt.04-07-2022 2/2 further submits that the impugned order shows that there are lacerated wounds to the injured but the same are not mentioned in the measurement. He also submits that these injuries do not come within the purview of grievous in nature and there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sonal Visbas, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sheikhpura in connection with Jairampur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T