Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39754/2017dfd for non appearance

Mahendra Sao @ Mahendra Pd. Sao v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39754 of 2017 (3) dt.18-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39754 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Mahendra Sao @ Mahendra Pd. Sao son of Late Shiv Shankar Sao, resident of Mohalla-Satbighi, P.S. Sheikhpura, Distt. Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed. Rizwanul Haque For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 54064 of 2016 with an observation that petitioner may renew his prayer of bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that a period of six months has already been expired and the victim girl has not named the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39754 of 2017 (3) dt.18-10-2017 Sheikhpura (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 45 of 2016 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and appear on each and every date in Court and on failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates, without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sushma/- U T