Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjit Kumar Singh And Others v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42431 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2020 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjit Kumar Singh And Others Son Of Dr. Triloki Nath Singh Resident Of Village - Tarariya, Police Station- Taraiya, DistrictSaran (Chapra). 2.

Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh Son Of Dr. Triloki Nath Singh Resident Of Village - Tarariya, Police Station- Taraiya, DistrictSaran (Chapra). 3.

Ranveer Kumar Singh Son Of Dr. Triloki Nath Singh Resident Of Village - Tarariya, Police Station- Taraiya, District- Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sachida Nand Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case no. 418 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 448, 307, 379, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of assaulting to the informant and others by means of rod and farsa due to which they sustained injuries. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have got no criminal antecedent. There is case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42431 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 2/2 and counter case, both parties sustained injuries as alleged in separate occurrences. It is further submitted that this occurrence took place because of land dispute and due to which these petitioners have falsely been made accused in this present case. General and omnibus allegation leveled against the petitioners. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case no. 418 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Chapra, District - Saran subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T