Nihar Babu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41087 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2026 Thana- SUKHANI District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Nihar Babu Son of Jahidul Alam @ Jahidul @ Rahman Resident of Village - Amaljhari, P.S.- Pathamari, District - Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate.

Mr. Avnish Kumar, Advocate.

Mr. Mukul Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sukhani P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have snatched the Samsung Tab, mobile phone, and other articles from the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of the investigation, co-accused Jarul was apprehended, and he has given his confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41087 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 statement, and on the basis of his statement, the name of the petitioner has surfaced. Recovery, if any, of the snatched item is from the possession of co-accused namely, Jarul. He further submits that only a bike has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which is said to be used in the said occurrence. He further submits that in this case, chargesheet has been filed. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.02.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Kishanganj in connection with Sukhani P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T