Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38112/2017bail granted

Birendra Rai @ Birendra Roy v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-24Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38112 of 2017 (4) dt.24-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38112 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Birendra Rai @ Birendra Roy, Son of Late Teja Roy, Resident of Village- Ghaghara, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Union of India through Assistant Commandent 51st B.N.SSB. India. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad For the UOI : Smt. Shail Kumari (CGC) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with G.O. Case No. 30 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 9 litres of nepali sofi wine. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody for about six months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for two and half months, as such, let the petitioner above named,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38112 of 2017 (4) dt.24-08-2017 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pupri, Sitamarhi, in connection with G.O. Case No. 30 of 2017.

It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U