Sunil Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51282 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Sunil Yadav, Son of Kalpu Yadav, Resident of Village- Naknuppa, Police Station- Sherghati, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Karanti Devi, Wife of Sunil Yadav, Daughter of Kalu Yadav, Resident of Village- Kamat, Police Station- Sherghati, District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 86 of 2017, lodged for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of demanding of Rs.50,000/- from the complainant and thereafter assaulting her and ousting her from the matrimonial house.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep her and the case has been filed after 10 years of marriage.

Earlier notice was issue to opposite party No.2 vide order dated 13.9.2018 and it appears that opposite party No.2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51282 of 2018(4) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 refused to accept the notice.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 86 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition is that petitioner has to cooperate in disposal of the trial. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T