Sunil Bhuihya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37640 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -ROSHANGAANJ District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Sunil Bhuihya Son of Bhajju Bhuihya, R/o Village- Chhotki Manjuri, P.S.- Raushanganj, District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raushanganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation levelled against the petitioner and one another person is that on account of land dispute between the deceased and the accused persons, the petitioner and one another used to threaten the deceased person with dire consequence and thereafter, it has been suspected that the father of the informant has been killed by the said persons. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except suspicion no cogent material has come on record to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37640 of 2017 (2) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 suggest any complicity of the petitioner. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court by an order dated 17.09.2016 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32121 of 2016 and in fact, his case stands on better footing. The petitioner does not have criminal antecedent.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the fact that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the case of the petitioner stands on better footing, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.
Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Raushanganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajaypd./- U T