Patna High CourtCWJC/15161/2015disposed

Karuna Kant Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-21Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15161 of 2015 ====================================================== Karuna Kant Jha, S/o Sri Sachidanand Jha, resident of Lohianagar Ward No. 9, P.O. + P.S. Distt. Supaul (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Supaul Division.

5. The Executive Engineer, (Water Resources Department) Minor Irrigation, Supaul Division.

6. The District Magistrate Supaul.

7. The Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

8. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Supaul Division

9. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

10. The Engicon Construction Private Limited, The Construction Company through Respondent No. 4.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 21-09-2016 Heard Mr Gopal Kumar Jha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned AAG No.2, appearing for the State-respondents.

Because of the fact that the State-respondents have already filed their counter affidavit, which indicates that the canal, in question, has not been adversely affected by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15161 of 2015 (6) dt.21-09-2016 2/2 ongoing construction of the road inasmuch as concerned area has been left out while carrying on the project, which forms the subject-matter of this writ petition.

In view of the above, the writ petition is closed with liberty given to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U