Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52642/2018bail granted

Surendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-05Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52642 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -217 Year- 2017 Thana -CHENARI District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Surendra Paswan, Son of Banarasi Paswan, resident of Village- Tilai, Police Station- Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2018 in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is of snatching away the bag of informant containing cash of Rs. 97,375/- and three cheques. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., later on his name transpired on the confessional statement of co-accused person and except suspicion, there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner. Further submission is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 22.05.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52642 of 2018 (3) dt.05-10-2018 2/2 aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T