Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39223 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JAMUI ====================================================== Umesh Yadav, Son of Kaleshwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Chandra (Katiyari), Police Station- Sono in the district of Jamui. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S.Case No. 01 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 498A, 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of dowry and subjecting the informant to cruelty and further allegation is that petitioner has performed a second marriage and thereafter ousted her from the house.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as she was suffering from illness he performed second marriage and other allegations are false and concocted. Moreover, she died during the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39223 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 pendency of the case.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, at this stage I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude it within four months. If trial is not concluded within the said period, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U