← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41926/2026allowed

Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-29Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41926 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Prince Kumar Son of Rameshwar Rai @ Ramswaroop Ray R/o - Dullapur, Police Station - Goraul (Katahara), District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(1), 126(2), 109, 304 and 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that one Sumit Kumar Rai has fired with country made pistol at the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of this petitioner does not find place in the FIR. He was remanded in this case from Mahua P.S. Case No. 105 of 2026 wherein he has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41926 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 given his confessional statement. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against him. From perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the main thrust of allegation is against one Sumit Rai. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.03.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having four criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Goraul (Katahara) P.S. Case No. 557 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of A.C.J.M. I, Vaishali at Hajipur.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T