Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46862/2024dismissed

Md. Sajid Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-26Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46862 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2023 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Md. Sajid Khan Son Of Mokhtar Khan Resident Of Vill- Banabigha, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Sagarika, Advocate Mr. Gautam Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is an application for grant of regular bail filed on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Jehanabad Town P.S. Case No. 461 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 411, 414, 420, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court on 16.10.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 66835 of 2023.

4. The following order was passed on 16.10.2023:- "Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jahanabad P.S. Case No. 461 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 411, 414, 379, 420 and 34 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46862 of 2024(2) dt.26-07-2024 2/2 Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is involved in A.T.M. fraud which is rampant nowadays in Bihar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.K.

Lal has tried his best to convince this Court that no offence is made out against the petitioner but this Court is not accepting his argument.

Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith with a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial in the case at the earliest"

5. I see no ground to review my earlier order. Accordingly, this application is rejected again. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T