← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42117/2026bail rejected

Triloki Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42117 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2025 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Triloki Singh Son of Late Ramdev Singh Resident of Village - Chakla, Mahamadipur, Police Station - Mohiuddin Nagar, District - Samastipur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Mohiuddin Nagar P. S. Case No.76 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1) 324(4), 324(5), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute, petitioner assaulted her husband by knife causing injury on head.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42117 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/2 informant for ulterior reason.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that the FIR has been instituted by the wife of the deceased and it does not appear probable that wife would falsely implicate someone who was not involved in the occurrence of assaulting her husband by knife. It is also submitted that subsequently the husband of the informant died and knife is a dangerous weapon.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T