Ramlagan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54719 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-1998 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ramlagan Rai son of Late Rajendra Rai resident of village Dipakohi, P.S Karja, District Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-10-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 62 of 1998 corresponding to S. Tr. No. 220 of 1999 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 448, 34 of Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he will not misuse the privilege of bail any further. It is further submitted that the petitioner went to Delhi to earn his livelihood but the Pairvikar did not do the pairvi of the case properly as a result of which the bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled on 24.02.2012. The petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2018 and as such he may be granted regular bail.

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54719 of 2018(5) dt.30-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned F.T.C.-II, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No. 62 of 1998 corresponding to S.T. No. 220 of 99 with condition that petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason, trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U