← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16021/2021disposed

Khushbu Perween @ Khushboo Parvin v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

2025-05-05Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16021 of 2021 ====================================================== Khushbu Perween @ Khushboo Parvin Wife of Valim Akhtar Resident of Village and P.O. - Dariyapur, Police Station- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran at Motihari.

6.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Sangrampur Block, East Champaran at Motihari.

7.

The Head Master, UMS Ghusiyar, Block - Sangrampur, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw ( GP-23 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, learned GP-23 for the respondent/s.

2. It is informed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/s that the action has already been taken to redress the grievance of the petitioner as would appear from Letter No. 118 dated 26.05.2020 and subsequent to that, the petitioner had also filed representation before the District

Patna High Court CWJC No.16021 of 2021(3) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran at Motihari on 30.12.2020. He submitted that action would have been taken to redress the grievance of the petitioner during the pendency of the present writ petition.

3. Considering the fact that petitioner has already represented before the District Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran at Motihari (respondent no. 5) on 30.12.2020, the respondent no. 5, if he has not already disposed the representation till date, is directed to dispose the same forthwith in accordance with law, in light of the communication contained in Letter No. 118 dated 26.05.2020.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U