Rajeshwar Yadav @ Rajeshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43403 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-615 Year-2021 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAJESHWAR YADAV @ RAJESHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE NATHUN YADAV Resident of Village- Phenagi, P.s.- Tekari, District- gaya. 2.

ANOKHALAL YADAV S/O LATE NATHUN YADAV Resident of VillagePhenagi, P.s.- Tekari, District- gaya. 3.

JEETENDRA YADAV S/O LATE NATHUN YADAV Resident of VillagePhenagi, P.s.- Tekari, District- gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioners came and assaulted him causing injury in his ear, chest and even injured his right hand. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that allegation of assault is not specific rather is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43403 of 2022(2) dt.14-12-2022 2/2 general and omnibus in nature, it is next submitted that there is land dispute between the parties and the parties are agnates and even the injury suffered is simple in nature which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence, it is further submitted that even the side of the petitioners were assaulted by the informant and his side.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 615 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T