Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47446/2017bail granted

Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47446 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47446 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAKAI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Pankaj Kumar son of Surendra Prasad, resident of Village- Mathuriya Biharsharif, Police Station- Laheri, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 175 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he only happens to be driver of the vehicle from which alleged recovery was made. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 21.06.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47446 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Jamui, in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T