← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10373/2024disposed

Gajendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10373 of 2024 ====================================================== Gajendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Vikramaditya Singh, Resident of Jai Prakash Nagar, Katihar Nagar Nigam, P.S.-Sahayak Thana, Katihar, Mirchai, Katihar, Bihar - 854106.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Purnea. 6.

The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Katihar. 7.

The Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna - 800001.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Roona, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 6 For the A.G.

:

Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 11-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for grant of ACP to the petitioner in terms of the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (C) No.8219-8226 of 2019.

3. Learned counsel for the State has raised a preliminary objection and submits that the petitioner has

Patna High Court CWJC No.10373 of 2024(2) dt.11-07-2024 2/2 submitted his representation for redressal of his grievances before respondent No. 5, namely, the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Purnea. Therefore, this writ petition may be disposed off directing him/her to pass an order on his representation.

4. In the light of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed off directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent No.5, namely, the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Purnea within 30 days from today along with a copy of this order and the respondent No. 5 shall pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within 90 days thereafter.

5. It is made clear that the Court has not applied his mind but only directed respondent No. 5 to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation of the petitioner. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U