← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23117/2011dismiss for nonprosecution

Bihar State Road Transport Cor v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2025-11-10Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23117 of 2011 ====================================================== BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT COR Pariwahan Bhawan, Veer Chand Patel Marg, Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR through the presiding Officer Labour Court, Muzaffarpur 2.

Md. Zainul son of Md. Shafique resident of Kanhauli Gausala Road, P.S. Mithanpura, Distt. Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Tripurari Nath Ambasta, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025

1. On 31.10.2025, this Court has passed a detailed oral order which reads as follows:- "1. No representation for the petitioner.

2. This Court, vide order dated 17.07.2015, had passed the following order:

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a prayer for adjourning the case for four weeks, so that, in the meanwhile, he may file petition for substituting legal heirs of Respondent no.2.

As prayed, four weeks time is granted. If within four weeks, such petition is filed, office is required to

Patna High Court CWJC No.23117 of 2011(4) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 list this matter under the heading "For Orders (On Petitions)" immediately thereafter.

3. In spite of it, no substitution petition for substituting legal heirs of the respondent No. 2 has been filed till date.

4. As a last indulgence, list on 10.11.2025 for filing the substitution petition. In case no substitution petition is filed, the Writ petition cannot proceed as a whole, therefore, the Writ petition shall stand dismissed."

2. Inspite of it, today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and no substitution petition has been filed for substituting the legal heirs of the 2nd respondent. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr/- U