Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46987/2017bail granted

Dharm Raj Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46987 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46987 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2017 Thana -MAIRWA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Dharm Raj Sharma, Son of Late Balchand Sharma, Resident of VillageTitera, P.S.- Mairwa, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2017 in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 506 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land partition dispute between the parties. The injury said to have been sustained by the informant is simple in nature.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VII, Siwan in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46987 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T