Vikky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42017 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2026 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikky Kumar S/O Fulena Rai R/O Village- Sishva Kharar, Ward No.-14, P.SKalyanpur, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner was apprehended with a bike. It is further alleged that he was not able to show the documents and the registration number and chassis number were also punched one. When the petitioner was asked, he disclosed that he has purchased the said bike from one Firoz Miyan.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42017 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that the bike was purchased by the petitioner from one Firaz Miyan. He was unaware whether the bike was stolen one or not. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 29.03.2026. It has further been submitted that this case is triable by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class. It has further been submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed in this case.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-12th, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T