Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.180 of 2014 =========================================================== Renu Devi, Wife of Shri Niraj Gupta, daughter of Shri Suraj Prakash, Resident of Village + P.S.- Makhdumpur Bazar Near Masjid Distt- Jehanabad at present resident of Village + P.O.- Sakraicha, P.S.- Parsabazar, Distt- Patna .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police
2. The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad
3. The Dy. S.P., Jehenabad
4. The Officer Incharge Mahila Police Station, Jehanabad
5. Neeraj Gupta Son of Late Mahendra Sao
6. Mother in law, wife of Late Mahendra Sao
7. Abhishek Gupta Son of Late Mahendra Sao
8. Priyanka Devi, daughter of Late Mahendra Sao Respondent nos. 8 to 11 are resident of Village - Makhdumpur Bazar Near Masid P.S.- Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, AAG-15 Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG-15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-01-2015 The petitioner is informant of Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 48 of 2013 dated 19th July, 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498, 506 read with 34 of the
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.180 of 2014 dt.20-01-2015 2 / 2 Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. On conclusion of investigation, the police have submitted charge sheet on 31st December, 2013 under Sections 341, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
The grievance of the petitioner is that since the charge sheet has been submitted by the police for the offences which are bailable in nature, the accused persons being respondent nos. 5 to 8 have already been granted bail.
The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondents to arrest the accused persons of the aforesaid case. The application is not only misconceived but frivolous too. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T