Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37751/2017dismissed

Barun Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37751 of 2017 (3) dt.04-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37751 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2017 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Barun Mishra Son of Shyam Sunder Mishra, R/o Village- Budhanplurwa, Sindigate, P.S.- Buxar (T), District- Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 150 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol along with four cartridges. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and other co-accused having similar allegation has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.08.2017, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 39721 of 2017 and petitioner has been in judicial custody since 01.04.2017.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, considering the fact and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37751 of 2017 (3) dt.04-09-2017 circumstances of the case and nature of allegation coupled with the fact that petitioner has criminal antecedents as he is an accused in fifteen other cases, as such, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, his application for regular bail is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below itself. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T