← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15945/2021dismissed

Ranu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-18Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15945 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Ranu Devi D/o Shivshankar Mahato, Wife of Ashok Kumar Singh, Resident of Village - Sadanandpur Baisa, P.S. - Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur. 2.

Ashok Kumar Singh Son of Harihar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Sadanandpur Baisa, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S.- Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur. 3.

Pravin Kumar Singh, Son of Binay Kumar Vinayee, Resident of At and P.O. - Sondiha, P.S. Pasraha, District - Khagaria, A/P Resident of Mohalla - Choti Khanjarpur, S.M. College Road, C/o- Rama Singh, near JB Palace, P.S.- Adampur, Dist. - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative, Reforms, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

5.

The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (SC-13) Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(i) For direction of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents to absorb the petitioner on the Post of Class III as well as Class IV of they have worked as Instructors for a period of about three years under the scheme of

Patna High Court CWJC No.15945 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 Government of India known as non formal Education."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondents authorities for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U