Bikaram Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28343 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -433 Year- 2015 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Bikaram Kumar S/o Dorik Yadav

2. Sanjiv Kumar @ S Kumar S/o Naresh Yadav

3. Pappu Yadav S/o Shyam Bahadur Yadav All are R/o vill. - Bariyahi, P.S. Barauni ( Chakia ), Distt. - Begusarai .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-07-2016 Heard Sri Shubhesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Three petitioners, who are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail in Barauni ( Chakia) P.S. Case No.433 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 147,148, 149, 186, 341, 342, 323, 332, 333, 307, 353, 379, 427 of the Indian Penal Code. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that it is a case of police atrocities and petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that two days after the occurrence, fardbeyan of the informant was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28343 of 2016 (2) dt.26-07-2016 2/2 recorded. In sum and substance, it has been argued that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the F.I.R. After perusing the F.I.R. the Court is satisfied that it is not a fit case for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U