← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55695/2021bail granted

Dhrup Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-01Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55695 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2020 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Dhrup Mahto Son Of Late Sukhdeo Mahto Resident Of Village- Salempur, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran 2.

Satan Mahto @ Sapan Kumar Mahato Son Of Dhrup Mahto Resident Of Village- Salempur, P.S. Manjhi, District- Saran 3.

Sangita Devi Wife Of Satan Mahto @ Sapan Kumar Mahato Resident Of Village- Salempur, P.S. Manjhi, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Prabhakar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Manjhi P.S. case No.374 of 2020 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioners caused death of the sister of the informant due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55695 of 2021(2) dt.01-11-2021 2/2 of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner No.1 is father-in-law, petitioner NO.2 is brother-in-law and petitioner No.3 is sister-in-law of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is in custody.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 13, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P.S. case No.374 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T