Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47497/2017bail granted

Pankaj Mukhia v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-18Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47497 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47497 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -75 Year- 2017 Thana -PURAINI District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Pankaj Mukhia, Son of Late Sitabi Mukhia, Resident of Village- Nardah, Ward No.1, P.S.- Puraini, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2017 in connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 75 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 341/323/325/427/379/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is case and counter case between the parties. The injuries are all simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Shiv Kumar, learned J.M. Ist Class, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 75 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47497 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T