Naresh Poddar @ Munna Poddar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28710 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -169 Year- 2015 Thana -DALSINGHSARAI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Naresh Poddar @ Munna Poddar S/o Maner Poddar Resident of VillageSardargang, P.S.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 169 of 2015 for offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of the S.C. & S.T. Act. As per allegation, at about 7.30 PM on 3.5.2015, there was a dispute between two persons. The Informant only requested the accused persons to settle their dispute at some distance from his shop, whereupon, the accused persons started assaulting the Informant.
It appears that it is a petty dispute.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28710 of 2016 (2) dt.28-07-2016 case, let the petitioner, namely, Naresh Poddar @ Munna Poddar, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 169 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T