Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42721 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2025 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Kumar S/o Late Deonath Mistri R/o Village - Kahudag, P.S. - Barachatti, Dist. - Gaya.

2.

Arvind Kumar @ Arbind Mistri S/o Late Deonath Mistri R/o Village - Kahudag, P.S. - Barachatti, Dist. - Gaya.

3.

Dilip Kumar S/o Late Deonath Mistri R/o Village - Kahudag, P.S. - Barachatti, Dist. - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 109, 76, 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 20.09.2025 at 07:00 PM, eight named accused persons including the petitioners came along with three unknown accused and demanded extortion of Rs. 6 Lakhs, on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42721 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026 2/3 objection, the accused assaulted her husband causing injury on head and also acted inappropriately with her and assaulted the informant by fist and leg.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that it does not appear probable that so many accused would have come to the house of the informant for demanding extortion. It is further submitted that petitioners and the informant are neighbourers and they are having dispute relating to passage. It is also submitted that even allegation of demanding extortion and assault is not specific.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barachatty P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42721 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T