Surendra Prasad @ Surendr Pd. Singh @ Surendra Pd. Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46853 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2021 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Surendra Prasad @ Surendr Pd. Singh @ Surendra Pd. Singh Son Of Late Ram Briksh Bhagat @ Ram Briksh Pd. Singh Village Ranipatti, P.S Rajepur, District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Patanjali Rishi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 307, 354B, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he fired upon the informant on his abdomen due to which he sustained gun shot injury and reason behind this as alleged occurrence is said to be previous dispute.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to enmity. It is further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46853 of 2023(4) dt.11-10-2023 2/2 submitted from para-8 of this petition that the informant maliciously tried to implicate the petitioner with concocted injuries as the allegation against the petitioner of firing upon the informant whereas the injury report shows that the injury caused by hard and blunt substance which is not corroborative with the prosecution version and in support of this injury report has been annexed as Annexure-P/2 of this petition. Nothing consistent material has come against the petitioner. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 31.03.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 172 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T