Rajendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 16082 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajendra Singh Son of Late Charan Singh Resident of M/s Bhargo Saw Mill, Compound, Mithapur, P.S. - Jakkanpur, Town and District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, urban Development and Housing Department, government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 3.

The Chairman, Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

5.

The Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Nutan Rajdhani, Patna. 6.

Sri Vishwanath Prasad Gutpa, Son of Late Ramswaroop Sao, Resident of Mohalla - Main Road, Khagaul Road, Mithapur, P.S. - Jakknapur, Town and District- Patna.

7.

M/S Kosut Builders, through its Director Sri Kailash Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - Bela Puranderpur, P.S. Jakkanpur, Town and District - Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Vinay Mistry, Advocate For the S t a t e :

Mr Rajeev Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG VII For the P M C :

Mr Prasoon Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 26-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

From the pleadings on record, it appears that the petitioner has grievance against construction being made by Respondent No 7 over a plot of land belonging to Respondent No 6 in violation of building bye laws. The petitioner has filed

Patna High Court CWJC No.16082 of 2021(3) dt.26-04-2022 2/2 this writ application for initiating action against the said respondents in accordance with the provisions under Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 and building bye laws, framed thereunder. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of this writ application, the Patna Municipal Corporation has issued notices to Respondents No 6 and 7 and they have been stopped from masking further construction.

As the Corporation has already taken action in accordance with the provisions under the Act, no further interference is required.

This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U