Santosh Paswan @ Santosh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54661 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -343 Year- 2017 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== SANTOSH PASWAN @ SANTOSH RAM Son of late Ramashish Paswan Resident of Village- Morouna, P.S. Bikramganj, District-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamla Kant Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 343/2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

Allegation is recovery of 21 litres of country-made liquour from house of the petitioner.

It has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 16.07.2018. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54661 of 2018 (4) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 343/2017, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T