Pramod Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HI GH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34490 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2016 Thana -BANGAON District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Pramod Mukhiya Son of Dhuniya @ Dhuniai Mukhiya, R/o VillageGorho Tola, Bangaon Uttar, P.S.- Bangaon , District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bangaon P.S. Case No. 08 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 341, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused person is of assault to the informant and further allegation against the petitioner that he snatched away Rs. 25,000/- from informant. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no allegation of assault against the petitioner and only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled and the allegation of snatching away Rs. 25,000/- is concerned, the same is ornamental. Further petitioner has been in judicial custody since 22.05.2017.

Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail, however, they could

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34490 of 2017 (2) dt.27-07-2017 2/2 not point out any specific overt act against the petitioner. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Saharsa, in connection with Bangaon P.S. Case No. 08 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T