Anil Rishi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39138 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2020 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== ANIL RISHI S/o Late Ramu Rishi R/o Amol (South), P.S.- Falka, DistrictKatihar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-04-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Falka P.S. Case No. 37 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has been brought in this case on mere suspicion and because of the recovery of his bicycle from the field near the dead body of the deceased.

On the other hand, Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39138 of 2020(5) dt.05-04-2021 2/2 A.P.P. for the State submits that as per the prosecution story, this petitioner had taken away the victim boy on his bicycle whereafter the boy did not return and his dead body was found in the field. Nearby the dead body the bicycle of the petitioner was also lying.

Learned counsel submits that some of the witnesses have stated that they had seen the petitioner taking away the victim boy on his bicycle.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the seriousness of the offences and the materials available on the record, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let the trail be expedited. The prosecution shall cooperate in producing the witnesses in course of trail and the learned court below shall not grant any unnecessary adjournment in the matter. If the trial remains unconcluded for no reasons attributable to the petitioner for a period of nine months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rishi/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.